OHIO'S ONE-DAY CLASS
Results and Reflections One Year Later By:
George O. Braatz
Bro. Braatz
has written an article about the one-day classes
that have been held in Ohio. MSA receives many
questions about one-day classes and felt this
STB would address the issue, particularly in
the summary "What happened to the new members?"
This article originally appeared in the Nov.
2003 issue of The Philalethes and is reprinted
with permission. George Braatz is a Past Grand
Master of Ohio, currently serving as Grand Secretary,
and an MPS of The Philalethes Society.
- Editor
While the concept of a one-day
class has been around for quite a few years
in a number of Grand Jurisdictions, attention
in the last two years has focused on Ohio, because
of its overwhelming success at bringing in new
candidates by this means.
In April, 2002, the Grand Lodge
of F&AM of Ohio raised more than 7,700 Master
Masons on one day in 10 locations in the state.
In March, 2003, on five Saturdays, Ohio raised
about 3,100 Master Masons in 25 locations. In
other words, within a 12-month period, nearly
11,000 new members were welcomed through the
one-day class process.
There has been much misunderstanding
by Masonic leaders and writers in other Jurisdictions
about exactly what happened in Ohio and this
article is an attempt to clarify those misapprehensions
and answer some questions. The authority to
have a one-day class was approved by a vote
of the delegates at Ohio=s Grand Lodge Communication
in October 2001. The legislation permits each
Grand Mater to decide whether he wants to have
a one-day membership event.
Did quality suffer?
There have been misinformed allegations
that candidates were "recruited off the
streets," and therefore the quality of
the new Masons had diminished. Nothing could
be further from the truth. All candidates were
required to petition a Lodge, as usual, and
all were investigated and balloted on in the
normal manner.
Absolutely nothing was changed
in the "recruitment" of one-day class
members from those brought in during the previous
193 years of Ohio's Grand Lodge. In fact, many
men of unusually high character, who, for a
variety of reasons, were unable to petition
before, became Masons. We raised elected officials,
business executives, clergymen, and others of
outstanding quality and stature in their communities.
Were the ceremonies shortened,
or altered?
The degrees were presented in
their entirety, and in an outstanding, impressive
manner. Complete lectures, charges, and educational
programs for each degree were performed. Tryouts
were held in all locations, so a virtual "all-star"
team of ritualists conferred the work in all
locations. Numerous distinguished Masonic leaders
in the state remarked that this was the best
ritual presentation they had seen in years,
if ever. The ritual work of these "all
star" teams far surpassed the quality of
work of any average Lodge. It was decided that
each candidate must have a mentor beside him
to assist in the degree work.
Each candidate was presented a
Bible (or proper Holy Book of his faith), a
lambskin apron, and a small specially engraved
square and compasses. Therefore, each candidate,
with his mentor's help, assumed obligations
on his own Bible, square and compasses. Each
candidate received and wore his own apron appropriately
for each degree, and each candidate participated
with his mentor in giving and receiving the
various signs and grips. Each candidate was
"raised" individually by his mentor
from his seat in the auditorium. The words for
these various activities would be given by the
ritualist on the stage but each candidate participated
with the help of his mentor. Other than the
use of a hoodwink and the circumambulations,
the participation of each candidate virtually
matched traditional degree work.
Where are the 'One-dayers' now?
Now that Ohio's second one-day
class in 2003 is history, many are asking, "What
happened to the members of that first one-day
class a year ago?" In 2002, more than 7,700
men became Master Masons on one day in Ohio.
Are they active today? Have they become integral
parts of their Lodges? Have they fallen away?
A survey of Lodges has revealed
that 8% of 2002 one-day class members are currently
serving in officer stations in their Lodges.
And these new officers are doing more than just
occupying a chair. There have been numerous
examples of one-day class candidates from last
year presenting "outstanding" degree
lectures at Lodge inspections this year. In
fact, a number of one-day class candidates from
2002 were selected to perform key ritual parts
for the 2003 one-day classes.
A more impressive statistic from
the survey is that 67% of Lodges in Ohio today
have officers who joined in the one-day class
in 2002. The one-day class has proven to be
an amazing "shot in the arm" for many
Lodges. About 550 of the 570 Ohio Lodges in
2002 participated with at least one candidate.
The benefits to Lodges include not only service
as officers and ritual participation, but also
a stronger financial base, leadership in planning
dinners, charitable events and other activities,
and a general boost in Lodge enthusiasm and
vigor.
The survey also has shown that
19% of the candidates in the one-day class are
attending Lodge regularly. This means that,
because of the one-day class alone, regular
attendance statewide has increased by nearly
1,000 brethren per meeting.
Even though no statistics are
available from previous years regarding attendance
or moving quickly into officer duties, several
veteran Masonic observers commented that these
survey statistics demonstrate definite improvements
over historic trends.
What are the demographics of class
members?
A different survey was taken last
year of the 2002 one-day candidates on the day
they experienced the degree work. Here are some
of the results:
$55% of the 2002 class were under
45 years of age; 30% were under 35, and 8% were
under 25. Obviously, younger men were reached
by the effort.
$ 69% had attended college; 36%
had college degrees; 12% had graduate school
degrees.
$ 33% of petitions were signed
by relatives; 63% by a "friend"; 4%
by both.
$ 5% are senior DeMolays.
$ 56% of the candidates came from
Masonic families.
$ 49% of the class were joining
Freemasonry with a friend; 34% were joining
with a relative.
Why did they join in one day?
The 2002 one-day Master Masons
were asked two questions related to their motivation
for becoming part of the one-day class. Of the
total, 91 % said that the shortened time (one-day)
for receiving the degrees was important (59%
said "very important" and 32% "somewhat
important"). Some 8% said it was "not
important."
Some 69% said the removal of the
memory work and examinations was important (29%
said "very important" and 40% "somewhat
important"). Some 28% said it was "not
important."
In other words, the shortened
time was a more critical attribute than the
removal of examinations or memory work.
How many are no longer members?
A somewhat discouraging statistic
is that 61 members of the more than 7,700 in
the 2002 class were suspended for nonpayment
of dues, but the number equals about 0.8%, which
is really very minimal. Sixteen members of the
class have already passed away.
What are some of your conclusions?
On reflection, after experiencing
two hugely successful one-day classes in Ohio,
one of the major conclusions is that there are
many individuals waiting "out there"
who really want to be Masons. Many of them are
family members of existing Masons. Many are
EAs and FCs, who never completed their work
(25% of Ohio's one-day class in 2002 were EAs
or FCs).
The class also energized members
to recruit their friends and relatives for the
Craft. For the first time in the lives of most
Ohio Masons, the Grand Lodge had given them
a "reason" to talk to their nonmember
friends. Their inhibitions about talking about
their Fraternity and their reluctance to bring
up Masonry in conversations with friends melted
away. They had something to talk about. An excitement
and enthusiasm exploded at the local levels.
Masons were working hard to let their family
members and friends know of this great opportunity.
The excitement also led to many new candidates
who wanted to join in the traditional manner.
Conventional degree work in many Lodges has
already increased, and will expand markedly
in the next several years.
The one-day class concept may
not be the right approach for all Grand Lodges.
It may not be the proper procedure for all Masons.
It is not universally accepted, even in Ohio.
However, in October, 2002, at
the Ohio Grand Lodge Communication, a proposal
to eliminate the one-day class legislation was
overwhelming defeated. The rank and file delegates
in Ohio have recognized the merits of the procedure.
It is hoped that this information
will permit future discussions of the one-day
class concept with a better understanding and
more factual background. Note from your Education
Committee of the Grand Lodge of LA. We thought
this Short Talk Bulletin would be of special
interest to LA Masons in light of the recent
changes in Catechism requirements in LA. W.
A. Morris, Member.