CHARTER-WARRANT
Among several meanings of the
word "warrant", the Standard Dictionary
gives the following: "That which gives
authority for some act or course; sanction;
authority." It defines "charter"
as: "A writing issued by the authorities
of an order or society empowering certain persons
to establish a branch or chapter."
The two words are thus interchangeable
in meaning. "Warrant" is more largely
used in Great Britain; "charter" is
more common in America Both words to Masons
in America, Scotland and Ireland now mean the
legalizing and empowering document issued by
Grand Lodge to brethren for the formation of
a new lodge. In England a warrant for a new
lodge is issued by the Grand Master, not the
Grand Lodge.
The first Masonic charter, so
far as is known, was that issued by Prince Edwin,
with the consent of his father, King Athelstane,
at York, in 926 A.D. This charter, told of in
numerous copies of various old Masonic Constitutions,
or "The Old Charges", provided fundamental
right of Masons to assemble, work, take apprentices,
make their own laws, have their own organization.
It is, in the thought of many, the fundamental
landmark of the Craft.
But to modern Speculative Masons,
the charter of a lodge is a document, setting
forth the consent of Grand Lodge that certain
brethren become the Master and Wardens of a
new lodge, and that the new lodge is of. right
and of necessity must be, recognized as an equal
by all other lodges, with no authority over
it and its Master except Masonic law, the Grand
Master and the Grand Lodge.
The charter of a lodge is so important
that, according to common Masonic practice,
it must be present in the lodge-room whenever
a lodge is open. Proceedings had without the
physical presence of the charter are generally
considered null and void.
There is one small exception usually
made, perhaps more by closing eyes to it than
from any real authority. A visiting Mason may
ask to see the charter of the lodge he would
visit. It is as much his right to make certain
of the legitimacy of the lodge he would enter,
as it is the right of the lodge to make certain
that he is a member in good standing of a lodge
working under a recognized Grand Lodge. In satisfying
the request of a visiting brother, the charter
obviously must be brought from the lodge room
for his inspection. It is improbable that any
Grand Lodge would rule that "no lodge"
existed during the time the charter was absent
from the room for such inspection purposes.
Chartered lodges began with the
first or Mother Grand Lodge. Prior to 1717 most
lodges were of the "time immemorial"
classification. Stone masons working on a great
cathedral had their organization, meeting in
the lodge (building) erected to hold tools and
supplies, meeting place for meals, perhaps at
times a dormitory. Their common work, common
aims and, as the speculative or ethical teachings
arose in their assemblages, common ideals, were
a sufficient bond. Apprentices were accepted
only at intervals; apprentices served seven
years before being tested by making each his
"Master's Piece", which, if it was
satisfactory, enabled him to become a Fellow
of the Craft, or full fledged Mason. There was
no pressure of applicants from without, no great
desire on the part of non-Masons to become stone
masons, except as some lad, (or his parents
for him), wanted to become an apprentice.
Hence a charter for a lodge was
unnecessary. As the Craft gradually changed
from operative to speculative, Masons still
held together by the common bond of their interests
and their knowledge of the secrets of the Craft.
But with the formation of the
Grand Lodge, a new idea took form. In 1717 a
regulation (Number 8 of the original 39) adopted
by the new Grand Lodge, read: "No set or
number of brethren shall withdraw or separate
themselves from the lodge in which they were
made brethren or were afterwards admitted members,
unless the lodge becomes too numerous; nor even
then, without a dispensation from the Grand
Master or his deputy. And when they are thus
separated, they must either immediately join
themselves to such other lodges as they shall
like best, with the unanimous consent of that
other lodge to which they go (as above regulated)
or else they must obtain the Grand Master's
warrant to join in forming a new lodge.
"If any set or number of
Masons shall take upon themselves to form a
lodge without the Grand Master's warrant, the
regular lodges are not to countenance them,
nor own them as fair brethren and duly formed,
nor approve of their acts and deeds; but must
treat them as rebels, until they humble themselves,
as the Grand Master shall in his prudence direct,
and until he approves of them by his warrant,
which must be signified to the other lodges,
as the custom is when a new lodge is to be registered
in the list of lodges."
The use of the word "regular",
above, is not in the sense in which it is now
usually understood. To moderns "regular"
and "irregular" are opposites. To
the Masons of 1717 a lodge was "regular"
when it had a charter, in the sense that it
was "sub regula" -that is, had come
under-the Grand Lodge. Many "time immemorial"
lodges did not immediately ask for, or receive,
a charter; this did not make them "irregular"
but only non-regular. The lodge at Fredericksburg,
in which George Washington received his degrees,
was a "time immemorial" lodge without
a charter at the time it made a Mason of Washington.
Five years after that event it asked for and
received a charter from the Grand Lodge of Scotland.
There are further etymological
differences between our use of words, and their
meanings as understood by our brethren of 1717.
An American Mason knows charter, or warrant,
to mean the document given by Grand Lodge, creating
his own lodge and in its possession.
Our early brethren at first understood
no more by the word "warrant" than
we understand by the word "permission";
the written document was not at first held necessary.
The Grand Master, his Deputy, or some brother
empowered by the Grand Master, gave permission
to certain brethren to form a new lodge. When
the Grand Master gave this authority to another,
that authority was contained in a paper termed
a deputation. But a deputation is not a warrant
or a charter-it is merely the authority given
by the Grand Master to another brother to act
for him in "warranting"---giving permission
to certain brethren to be a new lodge.
While modern warrants, as instruments
of Grand Master and Grand Lodge, began in 1717,
when the first Grand Lodge was formed, long
before that warrants or charters were issued
by Kilwinning Lodge of Scotland.
Just how old "Mother Kilwinning"
is has been often disputed; few will cavil,
however, at the statement that she is undoubtedly
as old as the fifteenth century and may be older.
Mother Kilwinning chartered a
number of lodges, thus acting as a Grand Lodge
before there was a Grand Lodge! The daughters
of Mother Kilwinning all took her name as part
of theirs and thus there came into being Cannongate
Kilwinning, Greenock Kilwinning, Cumberland
Kilwinning, and others, some of which are still
on the register of the present Grand Lodge of
Scotland.
The Grand Lodge of Scotland was
organized in 1736. Kilwinning for a time became
a lodge under the Grand Lodge. In 1743 it petitioned
Grand Lodge for recognition as the oldest lodge
in Scotland. On the ground that because the
old documents, minutes, etc. of Kilwinning lodge
were lost, it could not prove its claimed antiquity,
the Grand Lodge of Scotland refused to grant
the petition.
Whereupon Mother Kilwinning seceded
from the Grand Lodge, and proceeded to charter
more lodges, including one in Virginia and one
in Ireland!
However, time heals all breaches.
Just as the two rival Grand Lodges in England
came together after more than half a century
and in the great Lodge of Reconciliation in
1813 became one United Grand Lodge of England,
so did Mother Kilwinning at last, in 1807, renounce
all right of chartering lodges, returned to
the fold of the Grand Lodge of Scotland, and
brought her daughter lodges in Scotland with
her!
The word "charter" has
been too loosely used in the past for clarity
in the present day understanding. Thus, antiquarians
and historians of Masonic lore write of the
"Charter of Cologne" as "the
oldest Masonic charter." But this document
was not really issued by some Masonic authority,
giving certain rights to others. There is little
belief in its being other than a clumsy forgery,
made for what purposes any one's guess is as
good as anothers.
The document miscalled "Charter
of Cologne" was purportedly written June
24, 1535: "a manifesto of the chosen masters
of the St. John's fraternity, heads of the lodges
in London, Edinburgh, Vienna, Amsterdam, Paris,
Lyons, Frankfort, Hamburg, Antwerp, Rotterdam,
Madrid, Venice, Ghent, Konisburg, Brussels,
Dantzic, Middleburg, Bremen and Cologne."
It was purportedly signed by these
nineteen Master Masons in Cologne!
It sets forth various principles
and practices of the order.
However, internal evidence that
the document is spurious is so strong that no
Masonic historian now believes in its genuineness.
The Larmenious Charter, or "Charter
of Transmission", is another confusing
use of the term. It is a document of interest
to Knights Templar. It purports to be originally
written in or about 1314, but was not published
until 1804. It is generally considered to have
been written by an Italian named Bonani, who
fabricated the document as coming from the pen
of "Johannes Marcus Larmenius of Jerusalem"
supposed to have been the "Master of the
Knights of the Supreme Temple". Its alleged
purpose was to confer the Supreme Mastership
of the Order of the Temple on another; its actual
purpose seems to have been to attach a new order
to an older one. Into that it is not necessary
to go -the "charter" of Larmenius
is not a charter in our understanding of the
word, and its use in this connection has added
to the confusion surrounding the subject.
Most modern charters given to
a group to form and hold a lodge in a particular
locality make the lodge stationary. Such a lodge
cannot move to another location without permission
of Grand Master or Grand Lodge, a provision
necessary to keep records and permit inspection.
But there have been traveling warrants, usually
issued to military lodges, empowering them to
travel from place to place with the military
forces to which they are attached. The first
traveling warrant of which there is record in
this country was given by the Grand Lodge of
Massachusetts to one Abraham Savage, in 1738,
to be used in the expedition against Canada;
it was really more a deputation than warrant.
In 1779, Pennsylvania gave a traveling warrant
to a Colonel Proctor to open what in the document
is called a "moveable lodge".
The charter of a lodge today is
its symbol of legitimacy. It is its power to
work, to make brethren, to do all that any lodge
is empowered to do. It is its attestation that
it is duly constituted, dedicated and consecrated,
and is one among its sisterhood of lodges, with
rights equal to all other lodges, rights greater
than those of no other lodge.
By the granting of a charter a
Grand Lodge offers the greatest of evidence
of its belief in the trustworthiness and dependability
of the brethren named as the principal officers,
and the successors they are to install.
No greater disgrace can fall on
a lodge than to have its charter forfeited;
second only to this is the arrest of the charter,
which the Grand Master may do if in his judgment
wrong actions or contumacy have brought disgrace
upon the Fraternity.
While a Grand Master may arrest
(or take up) the charter, only Grand Lodge,
which gave it, can forfeit it. It is good to
chronicle that both arrest and forfeiture of
charter are very rare.
A lodge may give up its charter
voluntarily, returning the instrument which
brought it life to the Grand Lodge which gave
it; this is occasionally, not often, done when
circumstances have so dispersed the brethren
that not enough remain to act as a lodge, or
when indifference among the survivors causes
the lodge to become dormant.
The charter of a lodge is its
life. The privilege of asking Grand Lodge for
one is great. The responsibility of Grand Lodge
in giving life to a new child in the Masonic
family is heavy. The charter, as a result, becomes
the most venerated and loved of Masonic documents,
by the brethren whose Masonic life is lived
in its shadow.